Home >> Communications with stakeholders
Meetings with stakeholders
Over the course of the Plan we met with:
Schools - both the Primary school and Icknield Community College
Fire Brigade - meeting with the station commander
Water & Drainage Consultant - regarding flood risk
OCC - regarding highways and education
SODC - regarding Local Plan Policy, national legislation and monitoring of Plan policies and content and the importance of the economic and social sustainability of the High Street
Key retailers - including the Mid Counties Co-op - regarding economic and social sustainability and car parking - two meetings in 2016 and 2017
Age Concern - a simple explanation of the Plan at the outset to a cross section of elderly residents. Visits were made to the U3A and the Watlington WI.
The HCA - several meetings regarding infrastructure and Chalgrove
October 4th 2016 December 13th 2016 and the July 3rd and most recently October 10th
Neighbouring Communities - Pyrton, Cuxham and Britwell Salome
Two specific meetings with Pyrton - one with SODC at their offices and a later meeting in March 2017
Cycle repair specialist - cycling issues in Watlington
An estate agents view - regarding the Housing Market
We approached the Police, Doctor's surgery and Ambulance service as in the documents below:
Chiltern Surgery
Police
Ambulance Service
Over the course of the Plan as it progressed, we experienced opposition to the suggestion of the alternative route being directed along Willow Close on the Marlbrook estate - see here for some detail
Two leaflets were produced and circulated locally - one from the "Shadow Group" initially and more latterly from a group called "RAWRR" - "Residents Against Watlington Ring Road" which can be seen here
We requested a meeting with the "RAWRR" group to discuss the points made in the leaflet but received no response but the Henley Standard gave coverage
We responded to leaflets circulated by groups objecting to Plan - here is our summary of these two leaflet productions and here is how we summarised our replies to the "Shadow group"